Digital technology, media and intellectual property
Random header image at GB Media

Why software patent eligibility is not an issue at the EPO – and what the USPTO could learn from that

February 7th, 2017 |  Published in Intellectual Property

USPTO article

 

7 February 2017 – Bastian Best has a great post … rant? … on the flaws of the infamous “abstract idea” test. He says the Mayo/Alice two-step test causes much more harm than good and poses three questions:

  • What kinds of ideas are too “abstract” for a patent? Doesn’t every invention start with an idea? Who can tell the difference between an abstract idea and a “concrete” idea (I wonder what that is)?
  • When is an invention “significantly more” than the abstract idea? How much “more” does it take?
  • Some court rulings suggest that the Mayo/Alice test requires applying more than “well-known” concepts. Is this a hidden novelty test? Isn’t a hammer patent-eligible simply because it’s a man-made technical device, irrespective of it being known for decades?

He asks: “What if the USPTO just copied the EPO’s “any hardware” test when it comes to patent-eligibility?” And he includes a nifty video explanation of the “any hardware” test.

It’s a great post (click here).

 

About the author


Email | All posts by

"The mind that lies fallow but a single day sprouts up follies that are only to be killed by a constant and assiduous culture."
Latest Videos

Un aperçu de la FIC 2017 / A quick look at FIC 2017 (Lille, France)

Cybersecurity: a chat with John Frank, Vice President EU Government Affairs for Microsoft

From Legaltech NYC 2017: a chat with Andy Wilson of Logikcull

5G is coming ... and it's going to blow you away. Yes. Really.

The Internet of Things ... or the cybernetic consortia? (Part 1)

From the Mobile World Congress 2016: an introduction